by Ram ben Ze'ev
The potential acquisition of more than 200 radio stations in the United States by billionaire financier George Soros has sparked considerable concern across many sectors. Soros, whose Open Society Foundations have been involved in a wide range of political and social activities worldwide, is no stranger to controversy. His possible control over a significant portion of the American media landscape—an estimated 165 million listeners in over 40 markets—should be a cause for alarm. This move represents not only a potential monopolization of key media assets but also poses risks given Soros' checkered past and controversial political influence, especially his well-documented interference in electoral processes around the world.
Allowing a single individual—especially one as politically active as Soros—to control such a vast media network could set a dangerous precedent. Media is a powerful tool in shaping public opinion, and control over it comes with enormous responsibility. The radio stations in question would give Soros an unprecedented platform to disseminate messages aligned with his personal political views, potentially manipulating public opinion on a massive scale.
While Soros and his supporters argue that his initiatives promote democracy, equality, and freedom, his critics point to his track record of using wealth and influence to push specific political agendas. Soros’ Open Society Foundations have been accused of meddling in the internal affairs of numerous countries, often under the banner of promoting “open societies,” but critics claim that these efforts have resulted in destabilizing legitimate governments and influencing elections in favor of political groups aligned with his worldview.
The recent decision by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to approve Soros' acquisition of these stations adds to the controversy. The FCC's order opens the door for a massive consolidation of media influence under Soros’ control. While regulatory approval is a necessary procedural step, it does not address the underlying ethical questions raised by such a concentration of media power. The FCC’s decision has sparked concern among those who believe that such consolidation could undermine media independence and stifle diversity of thought in the media landscape.
---> Follow on Twitter/X @rambenzeev and read all of RAM's articles on X
Soros has faced accusations of political interference across the globe. From Europe to Latin America, critics argue that his financial contributions and foundation-backed initiatives have played a direct role in influencing election outcomes. This history raises legitimate concerns about what impact he could have on American elections if given control over such an extensive media apparatus.
One of the clearest examples of this was Soros’ involvement in the European migrant crisis, where he is accused of financially supporting open-borders movements and influencing European Union immigration policies. Additionally, in the United States, Soros has funded a myriad of political candidates and causes, many of whom advocate for policies that challenge the status quo. His funding of local district attorney races and initiatives to reshape the American judicial system has led some critics to accuse him of trying to reshape democracy itself.
Handing Soros control of over 200 radio stations could exacerbate concerns about external influence on U.S. elections, giving him an even larger platform to sway voters through strategic messaging. The FCC's approval only increases fears that this acquisition will tip the balance in favor of political actors who align with Soros’ vision, making it more difficult for opposing voices to compete fairly in the marketplace of ideas.
Adding to these concerns is Soros' controversial past, which continues to fuel suspicion. He has long been the subject of both political and moral critiques, with his background raising questions about his motivations and methods. While Soros has been clear about his Jewish heritage, his actions during World War II, when he was a teenager in Nazi-occupied Hungary, have drawn criticism and controversy. While much of the narrative surrounding his involvement with the Nazi regime has been sensationalized or misrepresented, the persistent cloud of suspicion fuels mistrust regarding his true intentions.
Even if his past affiliations are often exaggerated by detractors, the broader issue is his demonstrated willingness to use his fortune and influence to meddle in the political affairs of sovereign nations, and potentially the United States. Granting Soros control over a substantial portion of America’s media ecosystem—especially its vast and far-reaching radio industry—could only intensify concerns about his long-standing goal of promoting a globalist agenda.
In a country that prides itself on media pluralism and the diversity of thought, the concentration of media power in the hands of a single, politically active individual is deeply troubling. Soros’ potential control of over 200 radio stations could further erode trust in media institutions, especially given his history of politically charged activities.
The FCC’s decision to approve this acquisition only underscores the urgency of the issue. While regulatory bodies like the FCC are tasked with ensuring fair and open markets, their approval does not automatically translate into ethical approval. Given Soros’ controversial past and the role he has played in influencing elections and political outcomes around the world, granting him the reins to a massive media network would be a mistake.
American media should remain as independent as possible, free from the undue influence of billionaires with agendas, to preserve the country’s democratic integrity. The FCC's decision may fulfill the legal requirements, but it raises profound ethical questions about media concentration and its implications for democracy.
In a time when media trust is already precariously low, allowing George Soros to further consolidate his influence through radio station ownership would only deepen public mistrust and exacerbate concerns over media bias and manipulation. The potential risks far outweigh any potential benefits, and as such, Soros’ acquisition of these stations should be vigorously opposed.
###
Bill White (Ram ben Ze'ev) is CEO of WireNews Limited, Mayside Partners Limited, MEADHANAN Agency, Kestrel Assets Limited, SpudsToGo Limited and Executive Director of Hebrew Synagogue