by Ram ben Ze'ev
In today's interconnected digital world, the dissemination of information happens at an unprecedented pace. Social media platforms serve as conduits for ideas, beliefs, and unfortunately, even malevolent messages. While some argue that sharing these messages educates and raises awareness, the reality is quite the contrary. Reposting and sharing evil messages merely perpetuate the evil they convey, contributing to its proliferation rather than enlightenment.
The advent of social media has democratised the dissemination of information. However, this democratisation comes with a caveat – the absence of gatekeepers. Unlike traditional media outlets, where information undergoes scrutiny before reaching the public eye, social media often lacks such filters. Consequently, nefarious messages can swiftly permeate digital spaces, reaching audiences far and wide with alarming ease.
One common misconception is that sharing evil messages raises awareness about societal issues. Advocates of this belief argue that exposing the dark underbelly of society prompts discussions and incites action. However, this line of thinking overlooks a crucial point – the manner in which information is disseminated matters as much as the information itself.
When individuals share malevolent messages without context or critical analysis, they inadvertently amplify the very evil they seek to combat. Take, for instance, the circulation of hate speech or extremist propaganda. Each share or repost serves as a megaphone, amplifying the hateful rhetoric and extending its reach to a broader audience. Instead of fostering understanding or prompting meaningful dialogue, this dissemination reinforces existing biases and prejudices, fuelling divisiveness and discord within society.
Furthermore, the algorithmic nature of social media exacerbates the problem. Platforms prioritise engagement metrics, such as likes, shares, and comments, in determining the visibility of content. As a result, controversial or sensationalist material tends to garner more attention, irrespective of its veracity or ethical implications. In this environment, evil messages thrive, as each share contributes to their virality, perpetuating a cycle of amplification and reinforcement.
---> Follow on Twitter/X @rambenzeev and read all of RAM's articles on X
Moreover, the psychological impact of exposure to malevolent messages cannot be overstated. Research suggests that repeated exposure to negative content can desensitize individuals, making them more susceptible to adopting hostile attitudes and behaviours. By inundating users with evil messages, social media platforms inadvertently desensitise society to the very issues they purportedly seek to address, numbing empathy and eroding moral sensibilities in the process.
Proponents of sharing evil messages often cite the importance of confronting uncomfortable truths. They argue that shielding individuals from unpleasant realities only serves to perpetuate ignorance and apathy. While there is merit in acknowledging the existence of evil in society, the manner in which it is addressed matters significantly. Blindly sharing malevolent content without context or constructive discourse does little to foster understanding or incite meaningful change. Instead, it breeds fear, mistrust, and polarisation, further entrenching societal divisions.
It is crucial to recognise that raising awareness does not necessitate the indiscriminate dissemination of malevolent messages. Rather, it entails fostering informed, empathetic dialogue around complex issues. This requires a concerted effort to contextualise information, challenge misconceptions, and promote critical thinking among digital citizens. By engaging in thoughtful discourse and advocating for positive change, individuals can address societal issues without inadvertently amplifying the very evils they seek to combat.
The notion that reposting and sharing evil messages educates or raises awareness is fundamentally flawed. Instead of fostering understanding or prompting constructive dialogue, this practice merely perpetuates the evil it seeks to combat. By indiscriminately disseminating malevolent content, individuals inadvertently contribute to its proliferation, amplifying divisiveness and discord within society.
In conclusion, as I often say and write online, "we need not battle with darkness to drive it away; darkness disappears with the appearance of light".
###
Bill White (Ram ben Ze'ev) is CEO of WireNews and Executive Director of Hebrew Synagogue