by Ram ben Ze'ev
In today’s media landscape, we are constantly bombarded with advertisements. From flashy commercials to subtle sponsorships, ads are omnipresent in American life. Yet, have you ever wondered why multinational corporations like Pfizer, Boeing, and other military or pharmaceutical giants, spend millions on ads targeted at the general public? After all, the average American cannot prescribe pharmaceuticals nor has a need for advanced military hardware like an M1 Abrams tank or fighter jets. These ad campaigns aren't designed to sell a product to you. Instead, they serve a different, more subtle purpose—one that every voter should understand.
Corporate Influence Through Advertising
The reality is that these advertisements are less about informing the public and more about maintaining influence. The millions spent on ads by pharmaceutical companies, defence contractors, and other large corporations are, in part, a means of keeping the corporate media in check. The primary goal isn't to sell you a product; it's to create a buffer that discourages investigative journalism and ensures favourable coverage.
Media outlets, like any other business, rely heavily on advertising revenue. When a pharmaceutical giant or a military contractor allocates a significant advertising budget, they become a major financial supporter of that media organisation. As a result, there's an unspoken understanding that keeps journalists from asking tough questions, delving too deeply, or critically examining the business practices and ethics of their largest advertisers.
It's a strategy of influence, not of direct sales, and it has significant implications for how information is presented to the public.
Why This Matters to Voters
For voters, understanding this influence is crucial. The information you receive from the media shapes your perception of candidates, policies, and global events. When news organisations have a financial interest in pleasing their biggest advertisers, there is an inevitable impact on the type of news stories they cover and how those stories are framed.
This could mean less scrutiny of drug pricing, limited coverage of the consequences of war, or a reluctance to investigate unethical business practices.
For example, you might notice that mainstream media often hesitates to critically report on the pharmaceutical industry's practices, such as the influence of drug prices on healthcare costs or the aggressive lobbying for policies that benefit drug manufacturers. Similarly, coverage of defence contractors often skirts around the ethical and financial implications of arms sales, overseas conflicts, and military budgets. The message is carefully curated, and certain narratives are amplified while others are muted—all to preserve the revenue streams from major corporate advertisers.
How Corporate Ads Shape Public Perception
These advertisements aren’t just about silencing potential critics; they’re also about crafting a narrative. When you see ads touting the latest medical breakthroughs or advanced defence technology, you are not being sold a product—you are being sold an idea. These ads reinforce the notion that these industries are indispensable to national well-being, innovation, and safety. By funding feel-good, reassuring, or patriotic-themed ads, these corporations subtly shape public perception and align their brands with positive emotions and national pride.
This strategy makes it harder to question their influence. If pharmaceutical companies are seen as heroes, always in search of the next life-saving drug, or if military contractors are seen as the backbone of national security, the public becomes more likely to support policies that favour these industries. It becomes a form of persuasion that bypasses traditional advertising logic. The goal isn’t to inform; it’s to cultivate goodwill and deter scrutiny.
The Role of the Media as a Gatekeeper
In theory, the media is meant to act as a gatekeeper, holding power accountable and providing the public with accurate, unbiased information. However, when media outlets are financially dependent on the very corporations they are supposed to investigate, this responsibility is compromised. The revolving door between media companies, corporate advertisers, and political influence blurs the lines between journalism and public relations. As a result, voters are left with information that is filtered through a lens of corporate interests.
This doesn’t mean that all journalism is compromised or that every media outlet is biased. But it does highlight a structural issue that every voter should be aware of. Recognising that the media is a business—with advertisers who have their own interests—is an essential step in critically consuming news and understanding the broader implications of the stories you see.
What Can Voters Do?
Diversify Your News Sources: Don’t rely on a single news outlet for your information. Different media companies have different corporate relationships, and diversifying your news sources can give you a more balanced perspective.
Support Independent Journalism: Consider subscribing to or donating to independent news organisations that rely less on corporate advertising. These outlets are often more willing to take on investigative stories and challenge powerful interests.
Be Critical of Ads: Recognise that advertisements are not just about selling products—they are about selling ideas and reinforcing narratives. Approach them with a healthy dose of scepticism.
Demand Media Transparency: Encourage news organisations to disclose their advertising relationships and any potential conflicts of interest. Transparency helps the public understand the motivations behind the stories they see.
Hold Elected Officials Accountable: Remember that politicians are also influenced by the same corporate money that funds advertising. When it comes to campaign finance, lobbying, and policymaking, be vigilant and hold your elected officials accountable for their relationships with major industries.
Conclusion
The next time you see a pharmaceutical or defence contractor's advertisement, remember that it’s not about selling a product to you. It’s about maintaining influence, shaping narratives, and ensuring that media outlets remain compliant. As voters, it's crucial to be aware of these dynamics so that you can make informed decisions, support a free and independent press, and demand accountability from both corporations and politicians alike. In a democratic society, the power of information is as critical as the power of the vote—don’t let either be compromised.
###
Bill White (Ram ben Ze'ev) is CEO of WireNews Limited, Mayside Partners Limited, MEADHANAN Agency, Kestrel Assets Limited, SpudsToGo Limited and Executive Director of Hebrew Synagogue