by Ram ben Ze'ev
King Charles, the eldest son of Queen Elizabeth II, has long been seen as the heir apparent to the British throne. However, there are many reasons why he should not be king. From his controversial personal life to his political views, King Charles is not the right choice to lead Britain into the future.
Firstly, King Charles has been involved in several scandals throughout his life. His marriage to Princess Diana was plagued with infidelity and controversy, and the public's perception of him was further damaged by his treatment of her during their marriage. His affair with Camilla Parker Bowles was also highly controversial, and many people feel that he showed little regard for his marriage vows or the public's perception of the royal family.
Furthermore, King Charles has expressed controversial political views that have raised eyebrows among many people. He has been a vocal supporter of alternative medicine, despite the lack of scientific evidence supporting many of these treatments. This has led to concerns that he could use his position as king to promote these unproven therapies, potentially putting people's health at risk.
In addition, King Charles has been criticized for his views on environmentalism. While he has been a vocal advocate for environmental causes, some people feel that he has taken his views too far. He has been accused of promoting pseudoscientific theories and making claims that are not supported by the evidence. This has led to concerns that he could use his position as king to promote unproven environmental policies, potentially damaging the economy and the environment.
Another issue with King Charles becoming king is his age. He is currently 73 years old, and there are concerns that he may not be up to the physical and mental demands of the job. Being king is a demanding job, and requires a great deal of stamina and focus. Some people worry that King Charles may not have the energy or mental sharpness to handle the job properly.
Moreover, the role of the monarchy in the UK is becoming increasingly controversial, with some people calling for the abolition of the monarchy altogether. While Queen Elizabeth II has been a popular and respected figurehead for many years, there are concerns that King Charles may not have the same level of support. His controversial personal life and political views could further undermine public support for the monarchy, potentially leading to calls for it to be abolished.
---> Follow on Twitter/X @rambenzeev and read all of RAM's articles on X
Furthermore, the role of the monarchy in modern society is increasingly being called into question. Many people feel that the monarchy is an outdated institution that has no place in modern society. They argue that the monarchy is an undemocratic institution that perpetuates class divisions and reinforces the idea of inherited privilege. With the younger generation in particular, there is little support for the idea of a hereditary monarchy, and many young people feel that the monarchy has no relevance to their lives.
In conclusion, King Charles should not be king. His controversial personal life, political views, and advanced age all raise concerns about his suitability for the role. Moreover, the role of the monarchy in modern society is increasingly being questioned, and there are concerns that King Charles may not have the support necessary to maintain the institution's relevance and legitimacy. Ultimately, the British people deserve a monarch who is respected, popular, and capable of leading the country into the future, and King Charles is not that person.
###
Bill White (Ram ben Ze'ev) is CEO of WireNews and Executive Director of Hebrew Synagogue